Sunday, February 01, 2015

Human Rights or 3D living?

Rights!...?

There is a great deal of mention made in our modern world about 'rights'. Whether its human rights, animal rights, rights of the child, the Bill of Rights, rights to Privacy, women's rights or whoever's rights, being aware of 'rights' almost seems like the fertiliser constantly pumped onto our society.

But is the whole concept of 'rights' biblical?  This is the question I recently asked myself.

Actually I was particularly prompted to search this out further while reading Proverbs 31:8,9 that says in the ESV 

"Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute.  Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy"

You see, we have a problem.  In our modern world, our society has a habit of hijacking words and giving them new meanings or twisting meanings or modifying meanings.  When this happens it is all too easy for us to superimpose our current cultural word meanings onto biblical word meanings.  To be more clear with what I mean, we superimpose our current cultural English word meanings onto English words of the same spelling in our bibles.  However, we run a dangerous risk when we do this without thinking, because we can get a totally wrong perspective on the meaning of a passage of Scripture.  I feel it can be unhelpful when a translator uses a word which then ends up losing the impact of its biblical meaning because of current cultural usage.  If we are not careful we can either miss out on the depth of truth God wants to teach us or get a whole wrong slant on what Scripture is saying.

'Rights' , I believe, is a case in point.  

Culturally, the concept of rights, carries with it a connotation of demanding the 'freedom' of what we think is our due, or what we deserve.  It's what society in its wisdom has deemed is allowed for any individual to demand by law.  (In the case of animal rights or rights of the child, what is allowed for an individual to demand on behalf of another). Overall though it can have very self-focused connotations related to the rights of the 'self'.

But where did this notion of rights come from and is it the whole story when it comes to these verses?

I believe rights to the self have greatly come about because people left behind something far greater - the honour of the dignity of being created in the image of God.  Cultures which either don't acknowledge God or have a faulty understanding of who God is and how He interacts with His creatures, also lack a Godly value of life, particularly human life.

Yet even though we are told we just evolved, and some may 'believe' it on one level, on another level we inherently know we are something more than sludge.  We feel we deserve some kind of care and concern more than sludge.  So we start demanding what we think we deserve.

But the reality is we don't 'deserve' anything, - except the shame and punishment for our sin.  The very lack of honour we think we have, is actually what we 'deserve' if we are going to talk about what we 'deserve'.  But the reality also is that instead we have been gifted - a basic human dignity as ones created in the image of God even though that image has been marred by sin .....AND for those who have put their trust in Christ as Saviour and Lord, we have been given what we totally don't deserve - the dignity and honour of being 'in Christ' as a child of God, a position of equal sons with the firstborn Son.

So I think it is maybe unhealthy and counter productive in our modern world for a Christian to use or limit their vocabulary to the word 'rights'.  It not only by default endorses the world's agendas, but it also lacks an emphasis on the fact that we don't have to demand rights, because we have already been granted dignity.  If we follow God we will know more dignity than any demanding of 'rights' will ever give us.

In fact being a Christian is more about giving up our rights than emphasising our rights.
"Christian freedom is a very different thing from modern Western notions of freedom.  We celebrate our freedom to speak our mind in public (no matter whom we hurt), to do with another consenting adult whatever we might wish (no matter what time-honoured values and teachings we arrogantly trample) or to pursue wealth and luxury (no matter how many poor and hurting people we neglect along the way). The Christian's freedom is always directed by love for the other, not concern for our rights and desires.  It seeks opportunities to serve in the name of Jesus, not to indulge oneself in the name of rights". (in 'Honor, Patronage, Kinship and Purity' by David deSilva p214)

But what about those verses in Proverbs 31?  Interestingly various bible versions translate this passage differently - some use the word 'rights' (the ones of more recent years particularly), but some say 'plead the cause'.  I'm no Hebrew Professor but this seems to be a much better way to translate this passage.  It's nuance is actually broader and less demanding. This gives more of a sense of being an advocate, or mediator or coming alongside, of defending rather than demanding.  As Matthew Henry says in his commentary on these verses, We  "should be protectors of those who are unable or afraid to plead their own cause".

Dignity, Duty and Delight

I think there is a better way to frame our terminology in this 21st Century.  God has given us dignity and thus we should give others dignity.  Dignity is similar to the concept of honour. And in the light of what Christ did for us - any 'rights' He had (and if anyone had rights that never needed to be demanded or defended, but were simply inherent, HE did), he put aside for us, and thus any 'rights' we may think we have, we need to be prepared to put aside for others.  We don't need to demand our 'rights' or encourage others to demand their rights, rather we can rest in the power of the One who has created us with dignity and redeemed us, and thus in Christ endowed us with ultimate dignity, totally undeserved.  This sense of dignity gives us an honourable identity.

Our human demanding for our 'rights' I believe stems from the fact that through the Fall we lost the fulness of the honour of our gifted dignity, and as our society has increasingly ignored or rejected God, we have removed the joy and honour of even knowing the dignity of being God's creation, let alone the honour of the dignity of being redeemed by the One who loves us (John 3:16).

An atheist might argue that a person has no dignity with God.  After all, what about human suffering and the threat of eternal punishment?  The human suffering question is too long to go into here and I recommend a book by Joni Eareckson Tada called "A place of Healing".  On the topic of eternal punishment, hear what Pastor Charles Price said in a message he gave on the Judgement of God at The Peoples Church in Canada:

"It is part of the dignity of human beings that we are accountable. We cannot have a responsible society without laws. You cannot have laws without judgement. You cannot have judgement without punishment. 
And it is part of the dignity of being human that we are ultimately accountable to God. God actually cares about how we live. That gives us incredible dignity. We are not "nobody's", we are not incidental. And every one of us is accountable to God on that day. "
 (Living Truth video on demand accessed 23 October 2014)

To further reframe our vocabulary, I wish to suggest that instead of thinking about our 'rights' we develop an attitude of '3D living - Dignity, Duty and Delight'

Dignity
I have already talked about Dignity - as human beings and in Christ.
Rather than demand our rights, we can rejoice in our dignity.  Instead of demanding other's rights, we can advocate for their dignity.

Duty
We can also be eagerly willing to 'fullfil our duty'.  Duty may seem a very 'grace-less' word, but it encapsulates the antithesis of demanding rights.  When we demand our rights, its all about getting for ourselves, but when we embrace and fulfill our duty, its all about honouring God by giving to others.  Duty is about responsibility and logical and reasonable action.  Its about 'presenting ourselves as living sacrifices which is our reasonable/logical worship'.  Its about giving up of ourselves for the good of others and the glory of God.  It's about denying of self, not the rights of self.  It's about loving God because He first loved us, and thus as a result we love others with that same love.

This is the attitude of the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians chapter 9:12 "Nevertheless we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ."

Delight
But is this some kind of drudgery or 'drag' in our life?  Absolutely not! This is an honour. This is a delight.  Let us join with the psalmist and say "I delight to do your will, O God" Psalm 40:8 This is not a burdensome duty but a delightful and joyous duty.  This is a duty that has grown naturally out of a heart of great thankfulness for the honour and dignity God has given us in Creating us in the first place and Redeeming us and placing us in Christ.

ps.

Maybe you could join me and others in the following 'pledge' featured in a book by Nancy Leigh DeMoss and quoted in Randy Alcorn's blog recently.....

"In her book Choosing Gratitude, Nancy Leigh DeMoss shares a pledge written by a Bible teacher named Russell Kelfer. He challenged believers to write these words on a sheet of paper, and sign their names, then make a habit of recommitting themselves to it on a regular basis:
Having been born into the kingdom of God, I do hereby acknowledge that God's purchase of my life included all the rights and control of that life for all eternity.
I do further acknowledge that He has not guaranteed me to be free from pain or to have success or prosperity. He has not guaranteed me perfect health. He has not guaranteed me perfect parents. He has not guaranteed me perfect children. He has not guaranteed me the absence of pressures, trials, misunderstandings, or persecution.
What He has promised me is eternal life. What He has promised me is abundant life. What He has promised me is love, joy, peace, patience, gentleness, meekness, and self-control. He has given me all of Himself in exchange for the rights to my life…
Therefore I acknowledge this day the relinquishment of all my rights and expectations, and humbly ask Him by His grace to replace these with a grateful spirit, for whatever in His wisdom He deems to allow for my life. "

Read more: http://www.epm.org/blog/2014/Nov/24/choose-trust#ixzz3K4IZ3vua









1 comment:

  1. Geoffrey Bullock12:46 PM

    Your take on 'human rights and dignity' is similar to my thinking. Here is a part of a message I bring regarding 'dignity':
    HUMAN DIGNITY – WHAT IS IT?
    The Uses of ‘Human Dignity’
    People often speak about ‘human dignity’.
    - Politicians claim their policies have to do with ‘maintaining human dignity’.
    - Human rights advocates tell us that human dignity is their goal.
    - Euthanasia activists tell us that death ‘with dignity’ is their aim.
    Defining ‘Human Dignity’
    There have been many attempts to define ‘human dignity’. However, it is highly significant that a universally-agreed definition of human dignity can’t be found. One encyclopedia says: “International proclamations have thus far left dignity undefined” and “it is rarely defined outright in political, legal, and scientific discussions” (Wikipedia).
    The words ‘respect’ and ‘worth’ are found in many discussions of ‘human dignity’, but while many agree that people should be treated with ‘respect’ or given their ‘worth’, there is no agreement on what actions demonstrate that ‘respect’ or ‘worth’. What respect and worth should we place on Adolf Hitler? Should it differ from the respect and worth we give Queen Elizabeth? Is the statement ‘he looks dignified’ an objective or subjective assessment? It can only be subjective: that is, ‘I think he looks dignified’.

    All this means that the meaning of the phrase can only be found in the way the user means it. And if ‘human dignity’ means whatever anyone wants it to mean, then the most powerful determines its meaning in the public square! So the euthanasia activists; the politicians; and the human rights activists have their own meaning in mind when they try to convince you about human dignity. It’s a bit like the word ‘quality’ when describing fruit: ‘Get your quality fruit here!’ We sell ‘quality fruit!’ ‘Yes but what kind of quality’?! Likewise we ask the activists ‘what do you mean by ‘human dignity’?
    Why is there no agreed meaning of ‘human dignity’?
    I believe it is because there is no universally-agreed definition of what it means to be ‘human’. What it means to be human; how humans should be treated; and the difference between humans and other entities in the created order are questions that are answered differently by the many worldviews, philosophies, ideologies and religions of the world.
    Western views of human dignity
    I want to say that true human dignity is only found in God. Let me explain by contrasting the two major worldviews of the Western world: the secularist understanding – and under that banner I include the materialist, naturalist, atheist, and humanist – and the Judeo-Christian understanding. I will also highlight the subsequent results that flow from the respective understandings of ‘human dignity’. I believe this will make clear the vital importance of seeing ‘human dignity’ through God’s eyes, and thus restoring it in our world.
    THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN VIEW OF MAN

    What is the Judeo-Christian view of man? What gives man dignity in this view? We find the answer in Genesis 1:24-31. This is one of the pivotal passages in the Bible. From it stems much of the reason for God’s pursuit of His rebellious people.

    Man’s dignity stems from our creation by God:
    1. We are made in God’s image.
    2. We share aspects of his nature: the abilities to love, control, communicate, trust, reason, design, work, and create (in a limited sense) to name some.
    3. We were made to carry out God’s plan for the world under Gods’ reign.

    Regards!

    Geoffrey

    ReplyDelete